A printed retraction and apology, Miss Scuttlebutt. I believe I've made myself perfectly clear on that from the beginning.
[Journalists looking to sell papers ruined my family's life before and I'm not about to let it happen again!]
You're right, I can't expect anyone to know what someone's intentions are from sight alone. Likewise I can't expect your readership to read your article and apply the sort of critical thinking that should have been applied by your reporter before they chose to misrepresent the facts and apply to them the sort of spin that would paint Miss Fey and Mr Wright in a negative light. People will read your paper and think the worst and that is purely down to the way you chose to present your information. It is sensationalism and it is the blight of journalistic integrity.
audio;
[Journalists looking to sell papers ruined my family's life before and I'm not about to let it happen again!]
You're right, I can't expect anyone to know what someone's intentions are from sight alone. Likewise I can't expect your readership to read your article and apply the sort of critical thinking that should have been applied by your reporter before they chose to misrepresent the facts and apply to them the sort of spin that would paint Miss Fey and Mr Wright in a negative light. People will read your paper and think the worst and that is purely down to the way you chose to present your information. It is sensationalism and it is the blight of journalistic integrity.