So, you dispute that this Ryuko "caught you in her sights"? [boy, this was sounding more and more desperate!]
[PAUSE, as she weighted it over...]
Kahk-kahk...I'm sorry, but this is sounding more like a complaint and less like a valid dispute of a fact. You haven't said anything that would cause me to doubt Ryuko may have at least attempted at flirting with you, or otherwise done something that would put you in "her sights," as it were. Even if you say "she wasn't," she might've been and you just didn't pick up on it.
But, hold on! I'm not shutting you down, here. I can give you two options.
One: get Ryuko to contact me and I'll get her side of the story. If I think there's cause for correction, I'll issue one next edition.
Two: write a complaint about the column as a letter to the editor and submit it to me. We take those very seriously at the Cerealia Times and I'll happily receive it. Sss, sss.
no subject
[PAUSE, as she weighted it over...]
Kahk-kahk...I'm sorry, but this is sounding more like a complaint and less like a valid dispute of a fact. You haven't said anything that would cause me to doubt Ryuko may have at least attempted at flirting with you, or otherwise done something that would put you in "her sights," as it were. Even if you say "she wasn't," she might've been and you just didn't pick up on it.
But, hold on! I'm not shutting you down, here. I can give you two options.
One: get Ryuko to contact me and I'll get her side of the story. If I think there's cause for correction, I'll issue one next edition.
Two: write a complaint about the column as a letter to the editor and submit it to me. We take those very seriously at the Cerealia Times and I'll happily receive it. Sss, sss.